BIMA knowledge-sharing Legal & Finance

Linkedin contacts – whose property? 5 steps to protect your contact list

Posted by April 3, 2013

What happens to your employee’s LinkedIn contacts when he or she leaves your business? We explore what you can do to protect these valuable contacts.

LinkedIn recently reported record revenues for Q4 of 2012, describing it as a “transformative year”, at the end of which the company boasted over 200 million members in over 200 countries worldwide, up from 4,500 members when the site first launched in 2003.

One question which often concerns employers is what happens to an employee’s LinkedIn contacts when he or she leaves the business. LinkedIn’s own terms and conditions provide that ownership of a LinkedIn user account remains with the individual; this much is clear.

But ownership of the individual’s contacts is another question, particularly where the contacts are made during the course of employment, and/or have been transferred from the employer’s confidential client list.

In many cases, employers are only now beginning to think about this issue, but it is a ticking time bomb. Increasingly, we are going to see well-connected employees moving on to a new job and taking their LinkedIn contacts with them.

Where the employee in question is an account manager or a sales person, or otherwise works in a business which is heavily dependent on client relationships, this could cause real damage to the former employer’s business.

So what five steps should businesses take to protect their contacts?

1.    Whether contained in a social media policy or elsewhere, employers will be better protected if they make express provision for the ownership of contact lists made in the course of employment.

Where these are stored on LinkedIn, you could require employees to provide written confirmation that they have deleted the contacts prior to the termination of their employment.

2.    If you do decide to put a clause in your employment contracts about this, back it up with well-drafted post-termination restrictions which expressly prevent an ex-employee from working for a competitor, soliciting or dealing with clients or prospective clients, and poaching other staff for a period of time following the termination date. You should tailor these restrictions carefully depending on the nature of the role and seniority of the individual in question.

3.    Those employers who have appropriate protection in place will still face practical difficulties when it comes to the departure of key employees with valuable contacts.

4.    Imagine an employee confirms that she has deleted all of her company contacts from LinkedIn. If a colleague is still linked in to the departing employee and is willing to cooperate, this might enable the employer to check whether the contacts have in fact been deleted.

5.    However, even if they have, the employee could have retained the contact details in some other format, and might re-connect to her contacts on LinkedIn soon after. In order for contractual protections to have any real effect, the employer might need to be ready to take (or at least threaten) court action.

In a sense, the rise of social media does not really create new issues for employers; rather it provides a new context for the same old problem of how to retain clients on the departure of key employees.  What can be said for certain, however, is that employers who have anticipated these issues, and put appropriate contractual wording in place, will be better placed to protect their business than those who have not.

Have you experienced any of the issues above? How did you deal with it?

If you would like more information about any of the topics discussed in this blog please contact Virginia Allen, Employment Senior Associate, Kemp Little LLP or Elizabeth Kirk, Employment Associate, Kemp Little LLP

  1. On April 7th, 2013, Andrew Grill said...

    This all sounds like pretty heavy handed (legal) advice – and ultimately may be subject to “restraint of trade” if the employee has particular skills.

    I’d never sign up to these conditions. If I meet someone, they network with me not my company.

    It’s like saying people I worked with at an old company I can no longer be friends with.

    In 2013 not sure if this is really a fair and balanced approach – seems the advice is only to protect the company (some of which I agree with) but in the area of social, the people I connect with on social are connecting with me personally.

    The same applies to twitter followers – very hard to contract away ownership of a twitter follower.

    The other sweet irony is that while I can find LinkedIn profiles for the 2 Kemp Little Lawyers that wrote the article, I can’t see a social footprint for either of them….

    “to get digital you need to be digital”.

    Andrew Grill
    CEO, Kred

  2. On April 16th, 2013, Elizabeth Kirk said...

    Thanks for your comments Andrew – you raise some interesting points and it’s always great to get a debate going, especially on a topic this interesting.

    KL is widely recognised as the UK’s leading law firm for social media advice and we regularly train and advise leading brands and the biggest tech industry players. However, we always value the opinions and viewpoints of industry protagonists, as it helps with our wider understanding of this fast developing area.

    I’m sure you are right, in that many employees would share your frustrations with the law in this area – i.e. that it’s too restrictive in light of the recent social media boom. The article above relates to the law as it currently stands, but law in the UK is still catching up with recent developments in technology and it remains to be seen how much the legal position will change over the next few years.

    Trends in this area are developing fast and it’s certainly possible that the courts will take a more balanced approach in the future – as you suggest, they may well decide to adopt the view that a list of LinkedIn contacts does belong to the employee that worked hard to collate it. I expect many people are eager for that kind of change, but it’s still too early to predict with any confidence what legal developments we will see. I suppose the challenge lies in striking a fair balance between an employee’s freedom and the rights of an employer trying to protect its business interests.

    If you are interested in more info, please go to our website where you can download lots of articles, presentations and see details of seminars on social media.

    Best wishes,

Post a Comment

Recent Comments

  • Free Range Web: Looks like a great night was had by all. Congratulations to you and your team
  • Lucy Hastings: I have been following your teams progress and I must say I am impressed. Lots of luck to you.
  • Lauren Goodenough: Fab night guys! thanks to you all at BIMA and al of the sponsors too! Next year if Despark are...
  • Philip Tommy: This is a very useful article for people working in the web design and web development field.I would...
  • Ad Republic: Is this get together taking place again in 2016 Nadine?